Corporate websites and landing pages

Performance, Media, and Deployment

Website performance is often lost to images, fonts, third-party scripts, and incorrect caching rather than one “slow…

Discuss this directionContact form

Tell me the goal, stack constraints, and timeline — I reply on Telegram.

Website performance is often lost to images, fonts, third-party scripts, and incorrect caching rather than one “slow framework.” I build a media and deployment pipeline that preserves improvements after the next publication.

Scope covers representative mobile templates, image sizes and formats, critical fonts, widget loading, cache headers, CDN behaviour, builds, environments, releases, and basic error monitoring. Acceptance uses agreed pages and conditions: images cause no layout shift, primary content waits for no unnecessary JavaScript, caches refresh after release, and builds reproduce from the repository.

Acceptance criteria

Done when

  • Key templates render full HTML and pass agreed CWV checks
  • Canonical, sitemap, and basic meta are in place
  • Forms submit and notify as specified

Deliverables

  • Deployed site + CMS/editor access if used
  • Redirect / SEO checklist

Out of scope

  • Ongoing SEO retainers and link building
  • Stock photography purchases

The final acceptance checklist is confirmed in the brief or contract; the list above is a scope alignment guide.

Ballpark estimate

Scope size
Extras

FAQ

Tap a question to expand the answer.

Can you guarantee a Lighthouse score of 100?

No. Results depend on device, network, and third parties. The goal is stable user metrics and removal of specific bottlenecks.

Is WebP enough?

No. Correct dimensions, srcset, reserved space, loading order, and caching policy matter alongside format.

Discuss this directionContact form

Tell me the goal, stack constraints, and timeline — I reply on Telegram.

View full service page